Conversations with Todd

“The Secret” of NIMBY

Some things in this world are just inevitable: my hair continuing to fall out; the change of seasons; the collapse of complex civilizations. (Actually, that second example may have to be revised…)

So I guess it was inevitable that Todd would one day soon watch The Secret. Of course he would. He snoops my computer and the Internet like a search engine with a grudge, nosing around in every nook and cranny, looking for information to help him understand what’s going on in the world, and for ideas about how he’s supposed to help me. So by creating a Reviews page on my website, and adding a link to Carolyn Baker’s review of The Secret (she mentions What a Way to Go at the end…), I was pretty much assured that Todd would find it.

He did. He followed the links and watched it last night. I’m not sure how that works, a ghost “watching” a movie inside of a computer. I asked him once and he said it’s like his eyeballs become a television screen, but since Todd doesn’t actually have eyeballs anymore, the metaphor is limited.

In any event, there was the equally inevitable yellow sticky on my desktop this morning when I got up. A yellow sticky means excited, happy, joyful, full of anticipation. It said only this: dude when you watch the secret youll have some hope again

‘Scuse me, while I hiss this sigh… Todd seems to get it, and then he backslides. No surprise, I guess. That’s how it was for me before my inevitability switch got flipped.

Wearily, I sat down and started typing, not knowing whether Todd was around or not. “Yeah, I’ve seen it,” I wrote. “But I somehow missed the hope thing.”

There was no response. Todd was probably off surfing the net, “riding the wires” as he calls it. Knowing he’d be back, I opened my inbox and read articles on how the spring cold snap has devastated crops, on a deadly new fungus spreading around the globe on the heals of a warming climate, on the failure of Arctic sea ice to fully reform for the third year in a row, on yet another tribal people being ripped off.

As I often do after reading through a bad patch of news and analysis, I got up and did something physical, grounding myself in the present of my life. I washed dishes. I cleaned out a cupboard. I took some stuff to the local recycling center.

When I got back, Todd had returned: so you missed the hope dude how could you we can create our own reality its in the science its a law of the universe we can solve this world situation all we have to do is create it youve got to stop talking about collapse and extinction dude because youre actually creating those things you say you watched it but you didnt get it go watch it again go watch it again and then come back and tell me its bullshit

Todd was right. I got up, went downstairs, watched The Secret again, and then came back to my computer.

“Todd,” I typed. “It’s bullshit.”

why why do you always do this why is it bullshit its a law its in the science how can it be bullshit

Where to start? Luckily, I had some help. I put fingers to keyboard and let ‘er rip.

“There’s a million things to say,” I said, “but many good points have already been made, and better than I could make them. Carolyn Baker’s wide-ranging review puts The Secret in its historical setting, aligning it with the long held American assumptions of exceptionalism and superiority. She compares Americans to self-absorbed young children, oblivious to limits and convinced they can have anything they want. They have no sense of “enough” and are largely ignorant of the effect their attitude is having on the rest of the community of life, and on those peoples who live outside of this bubble of wealth and comfort. As the culture of consumption and entitlement is currently fouling its own nest, the last thing we needs is a movie like The Secret to feed these attitudes.”

Todd had no quick response so I continued.

“Matt Savinar nailed another aspect in his analysis, pointing out that The Secret is a distortion of a truth, made to produce a psychological effect. In this case, the effect is to encourage people to consume and splurge and go into debt, a result that certainly aligns with “the powers that be”. It turns positive thinking into a religion and makes negative thinking a heretical act. And it distracts people from seeing the connections between their consumptive lifestyles on the one hand and the destruction and death necessary to maintain that lifestyle on the other.”

“Tim Watkin, writing about the book version of The Secret for The Washington Post, goes after the central idea in the book and movie – the law of attraction – a get-rich-quick scheme that ignores such realities as “hard work, talent, education, even luck” in favor of quick and painless visualization and wishing on a star. Watkin notes the psychological and financial damage this is doing to people, and points out the “insidious flip side” of “create your own reality” magical thinking: blame the victim. If your thoughts are what bring you wealth and happiness, they are also what bring you illness, poverty and misery. A tough idea to hold onto when conversing with a starving child in Darfur.

Johann Hari, reviewing The Secret for The Independent, points out that “The Law of Attraction” gives a false scientific sheen to what he calls “the most extreme strain of positive thinking yet preached.” He notes how “the rise of self-help exactly coincides with the decline of faith in collective political solutions.” The Secret, like the self-help genre in general, serves to convince people that the problem is within them, and that they should not look outside themselves, toward the actions of political systems or corporate entities, to understand and gain control of their miserable lives. As such, The Secret is “a pure expression of Bushism: a slop of rancid aspiration-speak masking selfishness, social collapse and religious myth-making.”

Bo Lozoff at the Human Kindness Foundation calls The Secret “a childish exaggeration of a minor energetic principle”, a self-indulgent pseudo-spirituality which he compares, point by point, with “the religion it most closely exemplifies” – Satanism. As Lozoff says, “It’s all just so sad…..”

I stopped. Todd has pasted a sticky right in the middle of my document. It said this: oh

Todd is smart. He is a creature of Empire, to be sure, born in captivity to the dominator culture, a culture that is largely insane. But he is also smart. I’d seen this before. When new information and analysis reaches him, he can get it. The only trouble is making it stick. That takes a while.

Another sticky: that makes sense

And another: still something seems true there

“Yep. There is a bit of truth in The Secret, a baby in that bathwater. Our thoughts and beliefs and attitudes can shape our experience of our own lives, and lead us down pathways carved out by those beliefs. Like, duh. We all know this. It’s why we fall for the trick. We see the bit of truth, take the hook, and end up swallowing the whole fishy thing. The story of civilization and Empire is the story of just that bit of truth, as the beliefs and attitudes and thoughts of Empire have led us marauding across the planet, raping and pillaging and consuming as we went. Some secret. But the fact that our beliefs and attitudes shape our actions and experience does not translate into the infantile magical thinking of The Secret. That bathwater is as cold and putrid as it gets, and that baby is nearly dead.”

“That our thoughts can shape our reality is only one process. It’s equally true that our reality shapes our thoughts. And it’s equally true a million other things. This new sport of Extreme Positive Thinking supports the acquisition of wealth and power, and totally ignores the reality of cause and effect. It’s NIMBY to the nth degree. And it’s exactly the sort of thing that the framing conditions of this culture allow and encourage, as David Edwards explained so eloquently in his book Burning All Illusions. Anything that supports the notion that we’re to blame for our own pain, and in control of our own lives, anything that keeps the focus on the individual, ends up keeping the focus off of those who are profiting by the destruction of this planet. It’s dangerous beyond belief. And it’s bullshit.”

nimby

“Not in my back yard. The externalization of costs. The entitled American reaction when the destruction our lifestyle engenders actually has the nerve to impinge upon our comfort-addled lives. Not in my back yard. I get to enjoy the wealth, but I don’t have to think about the costs to the rest of the world. Like the folks in the Appalachian mountains now complaining about mountaintop removal. I’m all for stopping that practice. I grieve the destruction of the land, the soil, the trees and plants, the rivers, the animals. I’m deeply sorry for the pain and loss it has caused. But I find it very difficult to feel much sympathy for those people who only start complaining and protesting when the assault of Empire reaches their own back doors. They don’t have much to say when that same destruction rains down on the heads of others - other peoples, other lands, other species.”

dude thats pretty harsh how can you say that most of those people have no idea how their lifestyle is hurting the rest of the planet I didnt I mean I did but I never let it sink in Id heard about it and all but it just didnt matter I couldnt think of it

“I know. The people of Empire have been dumbed down and damaged beyond belief. Just to survive they’ve had to shut down to the destruction around them. I know that. I grieve it. And yet, sometimes, my anger takes hold. It’s a struggle I’ve been going through for years. I don’t yet have the answer.”

so your fear is that the secret will further encourage people to consume and amass wealth and not see how those actions are destroying the planet because those costs are hidden to them and not in their back yards is that right

“Yep. You got it. The ruling elite could not have devised a better tool to further the aims of Empire.”

Todd waited a minute and then posted one last sticky: I think I know how to help you

Then he was gone. I asked what he meant but got no reply.

I can’t wait to see what’s next.

8 Responses to ““The Secret” of NIMBY”

  1. AV Says:

    Brilliant! I have a masters in Consciousness Studies and when I saw “The Secret” I had the same reaction. Your analysis is spot on.

    When I was getting my degree (this was 1996) some of my professors would state that the people of the Earth and especially America were about to “wake up” and take a huge psychological evolutionary step. I would look around and I could see “some” evidence of that and a lot of evidence against it. I would present the evidence and ask, “what makes you think that we are going to make that step?” They would reply, “we will because otherwise we would destroy ourselves.” And I would ask, “why do you think that can’t happen?” Sometimes they would have no reply, sometimes they would say that they felt that looking at that possibility invited it.

    Over the years I came to realize that these professors and in fact most human beings suffer from the “exception” syndrome. It works like this: imagine a man who has never gambled walks into a casino. He is given the rules for the games and $1,000. At the end of three hours he has won an additional $1,000. If you spoke to him at that moment do you think you could convince him that gambling in a casino is a sure fire way to lose money? Even if you could prove it to him by showing him all the other peoples loses do you think he would simply say, “well I must be the exception, or well I must be smarter then them, or I must have stumbled upon a ’secret’ means to success.”

    That is the problem - we look back on our piddling 200 years of success in this country and think “this can never change, we are blessed, our system is the greatest on the plant and cannot fail”. We even look back over our very short human span on this planet and say the same thing. In all cases we may simply have been lucky so far and it may be time for the odds to even.

    AV

  2. Tim Says:

    Thanks, AV. Great example. Yes. The great cosmic roulette wheel is turning now, and our luck has suddenly changed. Do we go home broke? Do we get kicked out of the casino? Or do we get escorted to a suite on the top floor? The ball is bouncing even now…

    I appreciate your checking in on me and Todd.

    Tim

  3. Amy Says:

    Tim,
    I have not watched The Secret. I did listen to a 60 minute sales pitch with excerpts to entice me into purchasing a 20 hour take-off on the Secret. I agree with everything you say but I would like to take a step in a slightly different direction. A direction that I will call Hope. It should not be surprising that so many Americans have boarded this boat. You could say that is even predictable. But this does not have to be bad. If you look at the underlying pricncple that in order to ‘have everything’ that you want, you need to take a relly good look at yourself. Some call it ‘climbing up the emotional scale,’ others call it the release technique. It doesn’t matter what you call it. Surprise of surprises- you get someting you didn’t even consider in that ‘wanting.’ You make your spiritual connection. If you tried to market that, no one or at least a few, would not buy the program. But make it about abundance, make it about getting what you want, you have a much wider appeal. We have been the subjects of mass marketing for all our lives. Guess what else you get. You get a new conciousness awarenes, duh. I am a mere mortal who does not know all the ways that ‘that consciuousness’ can be achieved. We all resonate at different levels with different things. So I say - what ever it takes to get there is fine by me.

  4. Dan Says:

    Perhaps I missed something in Amy’s response, but…hope - a good thing? As in, I hope somebody will stop global warming, I hope we’ll get out of Iraq, I hope species extinction will slow down, I hope we’ll have enough food, soil, water to survive in the future. Hope let’s us rely on somebody - Big Brother, Jahweh, them, whoever - to fix things and save us. Not a helpful concept. As Derrick Jensen says, “I don’t hope that I’ll sleep tonight. I’ll just do it. I don’t hope that the salmon will survive. I’ll do everything in my power to ensure that they do.” Don’t hope for improvement in the global situation. That ain’t gonna help.

  5. Amy Says:

    Hmmmm… I didn’t realize that ‘Hope” was a subtitue for a’call to action. I think you can do both. Hope is relying on somebody - actually it is relying on everybody to do thier part.

  6. Jill Says:

    To reiterate something I’ve read in Tim’s writings, in the Erich Fromm book “The Revolution of Hope: Toward a Humanized Technology”, and I believe also in Derrick Jensen’s writings, we need to distinguish between “hope” and “hoping”.

    “Hoping” is a passive reliance on or belief that someone else will take care of things or that a difficult situation will magically resolve itself. “Hoping” is what Dan, above, and Derrick Jensen, whom he quotes, assail.

    However, it can be beneficial to hold “hope” in our hearts and consciousness; that is, allowing for the possibility that our individual actions are effectual. While we need to understand that we cannot “fix” the state of the planet or “correct” civilization, we might still make a difference in our individual lives and take babysteps toward the transition from our culture of destruction to one that supports the community of life. Since we have no idea how our actions might affect the collective whole, we may choose to step into our power of effectiveness to minimize our harmful impact on the Earth’s ecosystems and our fellow beings in whatever ways we’re moved to do so. In contrast to “hoping”, “hope” is tied to personal responsibility. IMO, to deny this “hope”, this possibility that change is possible, is to accept the most deleterious form of nihilism. I mean, why not party while the ship goes down? Because we hold hope that acting on our conscience will make a difference.

  7. todd Says:

    hi amy I know tim wanted to respond to your original thought but hes been away for a couple of days so I thought Id respond after all Im supposed to be helping him right so it sounds like youre saying maybe things like the secret arent so bad because even if theyre off base they may lead people around through the back way to the right place they think theyre learning to get rich but theyre really learning a new level of consciousness is that right I asked the same thing but that part didnt make it into the blog and what tim said was that while this is certainly possible and its even something sally has pointed to in the past for him its a matter of costs and benefits and timing that things are moving too fast now things are too crazy and there isnt time for that slow process and the damage the secret does far outweighs the positive effects it will have on those few who move beyond their ego desires to their more essential needs and wants he feels like by sounding the alarm hell have a greater positive impact in the world more people will wake up that way than the other way its an assessment he makes I hope that makes sense and I hope you can read this this is the first time Ive written on anything but a sticky and Im not sure if itll work Im sure tim will chime in when he gets back bye todd

  8. Amy Says:

    You brought a couple of interesting concepts that I want to explore with you. The first one is time. Time is a constant based on the rotation of the earth. What actually changes is the rate of something. According to Einstein, without rate, time stands still. It only appear that things are speeding up or slowing down. For instance, if you are driving your car and look ahead, things appear much slower thatn if you were to look out the side window where things appear to whiz by. Time has not changed. You will not reach your destination sooner by only looking out the side window. Now let’s look at that same time as it relates to our planet. Quantim physics tells us that matter and energy are the same thing and it is all interconnected. Energy appears as matter when it becomes dense. The planet earth is a living system comprised of a living cell in a human being; a human being as part of the planet; the planet as part of the solar system; and the solar system as part of the universe. Energy, regardless of it’s form always acheives balance. This process is known as evolution. Our thoughts and actions are interconnected forms of energy continually changing to achieve balance. Even what we perceive as destroying our planet is part of this. So here comes time again. We know it doesn’t repeat itself. So can we return to a former state where we had an abundance of natural resources? It will never be the same. We can’t turn back time. Before the industrial revolution, there was very little need of oil. But who then would have thought, or predicted, or even knew what affect it would have on us. Was that not part of evolution? So my questions are, Is our attempt to save the planet, really our fear of losing what we know and have (safety and security) being manifested? Is this just resisting evolution? I will continue to do my part to reduce, reuse and recycle. How that ultimately fits in to the overall balance is beyond my realm of comprehension. Remember the car. Where you are sitting can look in balance or out. Which one is right?

Leave a Reply


Close
E-mail It